Legislators discuss teachers’ seniority
Local educators and legislators are watching the debate over teacher seniority this week at the state House Education Reform Committee with interest.
At issue is a Republican-backed bill that would essentially change the way teachers are laid off by using evaluations rather than tenure, or the seniority system used by many school districts.
Minnesota is one of 11 states that require districts to use seniority as the deciding factor in layoff decisions. Supporters and opponents made their cases for the first time in the House Education Reform Committee Tuesday, but no action was taken.
“What’s on the table is we need to look at what’s the right thing for the kids,” said Rep. Rich Murray, R-Albert Lea. “That’s what this is all about.”
Proponents argue seniority-based layoffs drag down student achievement because students lose effective teachers; more teachers lose their jobs because districts have to let go of their least expensive teachers. Opponents counter there is no proof keeping senior teachers lowers student achievement but having experienced instructors in the classroom does indeed foster student success.
Many school districts already have measures in place for firing tenured teachers as well.
“There is a process right now in place for administrators to evaluate teachers,” said Rep. Jeanne Poppe, DFL-Austin. Poppe said the notion that firing tenured teachers is impossible is a fallacy.
Critics say teachers too often get tenure by just showing up for work — typically for three years, but sometimes less, and that once they earned it, bad teachers are almost impossible or too expensive to fire. The latest statistics from the National Center for Education Statistics, dating to the 2007-2008 school year, show about 2 percent of teachers dismissed for poor performance, although the numbers vary widely by school district.
The analysis by the National Council on Teacher Quality, a research and policy group that seeks to improve the quality of teaching, documents the shift in laws. In 2009, no state required student performance to be central to whether a teacher is awarded tenure; today, eight states do. The analysis also says four states now want evidence that students are learning before awarding tenure.
Minnesota’s current proposal, sponsored by Rep. Branden Petersen, R-Andover, would change the way districts place teachers on unrequested leaves of absence by allowing districts to base those decisions on evaluations rather than seniority. School boards would come up with layoff plans based on licensure and evaluation rankings, from the lowest-scoring teachers to the highest.
Legislators passed a data-added teacher evaluation system as part of the education budget bill last year. Lawmakers have yet to define the evaluation system and Minnesota Department of Education officials are coming up with proposals.
“We’ve already done some tweaking, there’s already been changes made,” Poppe said. “Further recommendaitons may come forward from that process, but we have try something before we can say it’s not doable, not acceptable.”
In addition, Poppe questioned why state lawmakers should make decisions that she said should be in educators’ hands.
“I don’t believe it’s the role of the state representative to do that,” she said. “That’s why you have principals, superintendents and school boards.”
Teacher accountability has become a prominent educational issue over the past couple years as more school districts across the nation fail to make Adequate Yearly Progress under federal No Child Left Behind laws.
But many teachers feel under siege. They argue the evaluation systems are too dependent on standardized tests. While teachers’ unions have gotten more on board with strengthening teacher evaluations, they often question the systems’ fairness and want them designed with local teachers’ input.
Though the evaluation system put in place last year has yet to come to fruition in Minnesota, that shouldn’t discourage lawmakers from finding ways to keep public employees accountable, according to Murray.
“(Last year’s evaluation system is) a good first step, but we probably need to continue to tweak that and work with it to determine what’s best,” he said.
—The Associated Press contributed to this report.